There's a thing about being a guy who was born after 1970. In my case, born in 1972.
I think I'm in the majority when I say I come from what these days is called a dysfunctional family but back then was called a "divorced" family. I had a pretty life changing 10th year I guess, but really I don't think I did.
I'm the third of three kids - if you're from a family with more than one child you know there's a prescribed way you should be today. The first born is typically kind of parenting to the later kids, the middle kid is a sort of purgatory between youngest kid born and oldest kid born in that you're both a parent and "not as respected" since you're not oldest. And then there's youngest. That was/is me.
I was the third which means my parents went through some sh*t with the first, my big brother, had those things confirmed with the second, my big sister, and by the time I came around, everything was copacetic. It was cool. If I set fire to the house it was probably much less of an eyebrow raiser than it probably would have been had it happened with Tommy (older brother). P.S. - I did that. I set fire to our house. I got a spanking - no military academy, no therapy (hadn't heard of that sort of thing growing up in the South back then), no hispanic housekeeper to minimize my acting out. It was normal. I'm normal.
My point is late in coming but there are things that I do not because of my upbringing, not because of nurture, but because of nature. I believe in nurture vs. nature, don't get me wrong. Actually, I guess I believe in nature & nurture. I fully believe I'm who I am because of my influences, but I also believe there are things we do because of nature.
Allow me to illustrate - I'm a guy, I was raised by a mom and older sister who were both mothering, but I'm still stoic. I didn't have a male influence in my life - older brother was (and may still be) a stoner, burn-out, and my dad was and is vacant. He was a weekend warrior but only every other weekend, so even less so. I love pops, don't git me wrong, yo. I just love him familial-ley, not necessarily respectfully.
Damn, I'm still not to my point.
I have an undergraduate degree in English, BofA, in creative writing. I don't write - I did, but I don't, other than a haiku every morning to get the synapses firing, but I do read. I read everything in front of me, actually. I'm a print hound/whore. Lately, with my schedule, I read poetry because it's concise, conveys a lot, and I don't spend weeks reading it like I do fiction. My favorite poem has always, ALWAYS, been "
Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night" by Dylan Thomas. He's not my favorite poet, for that check William Brautigan or my good friend Michael Graber for my favorite poets, but the poem . . . the poem. It speaks volumes of and to STOICISM. I'm stoic. I'm independent. I don't commit to anything deeper than happy hour with acquaintances or standing, recurring good times with my closest friends (and I have less than a handful, Gary, Shawn, and Zack).
Do Not Go Gently . . . speaks mounds and mounds of stoicism. Do not go gently into that good night. Rage. RAGE! against the dying of the light. It's all about standing firm, not giving in to the last thing you could possibly not give in to, it's about being you to the core, in my opinion, and it's also about hope. You don't hear a stoic talk about hope but what is stoicism but hope? It's full of bravado and the steadfast belief that what you think is true, that it seems as solid a ground to stand on tomorrow as it did today.
So, my point? My point is to say I rave against the dying of the light, but I also embrace the sunset and the time it affords me with my chosen friends, not the ones I work with necessarily but the ones I seek out, the ones I choose to spend days with because I think I'll learn from them. I'm lucky to have friends like that, right?
Aren't we all?